Solutions for Growth        

Defence & Aerospace Supplier Guidance:

Choosing when to bid on defence opportunities

Publication date: 2007

Bid/no-bid decisions for sales opportunities are aimed at eliminating opportunities or leads that you have a low probability of winning, permitting greater focus on opportunities that can be won. A positive bid decision initiates all bid and proposal preparation steps. Improving your bid discipline will increase your close rate, increase the total value of sales won, reduce the number of proposals submitted, and probably improve your earnings.

 

 

Context

Every sales representative’s objective is to win the order without submitting a competitive proposal. Leading sales training methodologies recommend avoiding proposals, and several practitioners suggest that being asked to submit a proposal is a signal that the sales representative has failed. Unfortunately, many buyers must request competitive proposals by law or organizational policy.

Proposals are used for more than just “selecting a vendor”– they are often used as a negotiating tool or a contracting vehicle. Sales professionals need to take proposal development and submission very seriously. A sound bid/no-bid decision is critical to sales effectiveness.

Bid decisions are a milestone event after a positive pursuit decision and before a bid validation decision. Use the pursuit decision to verify that the opportunity fits your organization’s strategic direction and capability before expending your time and energy on opportunities that you are unlikely to win. Use the bid decision to verify you are positioned to win before committing to an expensive sales effort. Use the bid validation decision to confirm that you have addressed all “show stoppers,” including requirements that you cannot meet, unacceptable terms and conditions, unreasonable schedule, unacceptable performance warranties or penalties, or reliable information that a competitor is pre-selected. Pursuit, bid, and bid validation decisions tend to be combined into a single bid decision when the sales cycle from opportunity identification to buying decision is less than 30 days. Customize and further define the inputs, outputs, and responsibilities for each decision milestone for your organization.

Table 1: Pursuit, Bid, and Bid Validation Decision Inputs and Outputs

Pursuit Decision
InputsOutputs
- Strategic plan
- Annual business plan
- Prospect's strategic direction
- Identified leads/opportunities
- Strategic fit agreed
- Capture manager assigned
- Capture plan to be prepared
- Initial budget set
- Tracking and review process set
Bid Decision
InputsOutputs
- Prospect's strategic direction
- Prospect's needs and wants
- Draft bid request
- Current capture plan
- Competitive assessment
- Win strategy
- Positioning effectiveness report
- Strategic fit confirmed
- Proposal manager assigned
- Proposal plan to be prepared
- Proposal strategy to be prepared
- Initial proposal budget set
- First draft executive summary assigned
- Solution overview assigned
- Boilerplate and proof to be assembled
- Tracking and review process set
- Risk assessment assigned
Bid Validation Decision
InputsOutputs
- Final bid request
- Current capture plan
- Current proposal plan
- Draft executive summary
- Solution overview
- Boilerplate and proof examples
- Risk assessment
- Approved capture plan
- Approved proposal plan
- Draft executive summary
- Writer's assignments set
- Proposal kickoff set
- Tracking and review process set

 

Reasons to Pay Attention

Sound, consistent, disciplined bid decisions benefit you and your organization. Not all benefits are obvious from either perspective.

Look closely at your organization to see if your bid decision process discipline resembles these poor practices:

  • Sales people with challenging quotas make pursuit decisions. Sales management requires no- pursuit decisions to be justified. Therefore, you find it easier to pursue everything.
  • Bid decisions are initiated by receipt of bid requests. The only valid reason to no-bid is lack of resources, you or others, to prepare the bid.
  • A bid validation milestone is not recognized. Any reconsideration of a prior positive bid decision is treated as a bid justification.
  • If sales representatives’ bids are prepared by others, bids are free. Free items are over-consumed.

Here is the false logic:

If I no-bid, my chance of winning is greater than zero; therefore, bid everything, limited only by my resources.

Here is what best practice shows:

Improving bid discipline can double or triple win rates. Win rate is defined as the percentage of deals won divided by the number of deals you bid on. Improving the quality of the proposals submitted can improve win rates by 15 to 20 percent.

Organizations that improve their bid discipline will routinely report increased sales revenue, reduced sales cost as a percent of revenue won, improved sales quality (profit margin on sales), and reduced sales force and customer turnover rates.

The person or persons involved in bid decisions vary with the size of the opportunity, size of the organization, and the risk of the opportunity to the bidding organization.

Individual sales representatives usually have the authority to make bid/no-bid decisions for small opportunities. As the size of the opportunity increases and when support is required to prepare the bid, then sales and delivery management people become involved. When bid preparation support is not available, many organizations still let sales representatives prepare and submit bids. A best practice is to define the positions and the responsibility and authority of people in those positions to make bid decisions.

Larger organizations tend to have a written bid decision process. Typically, as the size and the risk of the bid increases, increasingly senior managers make the bid decision. The sales representative’s role is limited to making a bid/no-bid recommendation.

Step-by-Step Overview of the Bid Decision

Use a bid/no-bid checklist or decision tree to improve the quality and consistency of your bid decisions. Bid/no-bid checklists prompt you to broadly examine each opportunity. Critical bid-killers are often overlooked, both wasting your time and squandering valuable resources.

Use the bid/no-bid checklist to identify what you do not know. Determining what you need to learn is usually more important than making the bid/no-bid decision. Tailor the generic bid/no-bid checklist in Table 2. Checklist items are grouped into four distinct areas: the prospect, the bid request, yourself, and the competition. Not all areas will apply for every opportunity.

Table 2: Bid/No-Bid Checklist

Questions About the Prospect
Who are the key people making the selection decision?
What are the primary issues driving this decision? What pain are they feeling?
How does it support this organization’s strategic direction?
What is the timeframe? Is it reasonable?
Is the opportunity real? Is the budget approved and realistic?
Who established the requirements? Have we influenced the requirements?
What are the client’s technical issues? What are the client’s business issues?
Questions About the Bid Request
Will a formal bid request be issued? When?
If no formal bid request, have we discussed the prospect’s needs in a proposal?
How large and detailed is the requested bid?
What is the specific proposal content and format?
What are the technical requirements?
What are the contractual requirements?
How will the proposal be evaluated? Who are the probable evaluators?
What are the evaluation criteria? How are the requirements weighted?
What pricing/costing information is required?
Questions About Us
Do we have the resources and will to win this opportunity?
Do we have the resources and ability to handle the job if we win?
Can we meet the prospect’s requirements?
Do we have any unique differentiators? What favors us?
What is our track record with this type of work and with this prospect?
What are our chances of winning? What are the consequences of losing or not bidding?
Can we meet/accept the terms and conditions?
What are the schedule, investment, and personnel risks considering current contracts?
What are the opportunity costs?
Can we manage the risks?
Questions About the Competition
Is there an incumbent? If so, how well have they done?
Who are the probable competitors? Does the prospect favor any of them?
What is the history of probable competitors with this prospect?
What are competitors’ probable strategies and solutions?
What are the strengths, weaknesses, and discriminators of each competitor?

 

The generic bid/no-bid checklist shown above must be tailored to fit your organization and market sector. Testing each opportunity against standard bid criteria will eliminate poor opportunities, freeing time and resources to focus on opportunities you are more likely to win.

Your bid/no-bid checklist tells you what you do not know, but the bid decision is not necessarily obvious. For example, how many unknowns are needed to prompt no-bid decisions? Use decision trees to focus on the bid decision. When compared to bid checklists, bid decision trees are less information-driven and are more decision-driven. Consider using both bid/no-bid checklists and bid decision trees to establish your process.

Make the most of a no-bid decision. If you elect to bid, proceed. If you elect to no-bid, the pursuit of this opportunity stops, but your prospect strategy continues. A no-bid decision does not mean a lost prospect. Position the prospect for future opportunities.


Source: B. Douglas - LSI
Publication date: 2007


Related Defence Supplier Guidance


 

Contact Jeffrey Strategic Solutions for Growth

To find out how your company can establish sound bid/no-bid decision-making capabilities for defence procurement opportunities, contact Jeffrey Strategic.

 
 
 
 
 
Contact

+44 (0)20 3291 2981

-
Top
 
-
Top
 
   
 © 2008 Jeffrey Strategic Limited.  All rights reserved.  Registered in England and Wales No. 06365575 
www.jeffreystrategic.com  |  +44 (0)20 3291 2981  |  info@jeffreystrategic.com